06/08/2026

Italy Teaches Business. It's Time to Let Students Do Business

By Gabby Goetz, Makena Maddigan, and Albert Schram, Ph.D.
USAC Verona, International Business Program

Italy is a nation of entrepreneurs. Ninety-nine percent of its businesses are small and medium-sized enterprises, family firms, workshops, and start-ups that together form the backbone of the economy (European Commission, 2024). And yet most Italian students finish secondary school without ever having run a business project, managed a budget, or pitched an idea to a real professional. Italian teenagers score below the OECD average in financial literacy (OECD, 2024), and employers report, year after year, that graduates arrive with strong theory but weak practical skills. Something does not add up.

Two students in the USAC Verona International Business program, Makena Maddigan and Gabby Goetz, spent their summer studying this paradox. Their research report, Integrating Junior Achievement Successfully into the Italian School System (Maddigan & Goetz, 2026), offers a refreshingly concrete answer: do not build a new system, strengthen the one Italy already has.

A gap everyone recognizes

Readers of this blog will be familiar with the shortcomings of Italy's national work-based learning framework, so a brief reminder suffices. The Pathways for Transversal Skills and Orientation (PCTO), successor to Alternanza Scuola-Lavoro, obliges students to complete hundreds of hours in workplace settings, but the quality of those hours is notoriously uneven. Placements vary enormously by region and school type, communication between schools and employers is inconsistent, students often arrive at internships underprepared, and many placements amount to observation rather than genuine skill-building (Maddigan & Goetz, 2026). The intent of the reform was sound. Its execution has left a gap between what students are supposed to gain and what they actually do.


The consequences show up in the data. In the 2022 OECD PISA assessment of financial literacy, Italian students scored 484, below the OECD average of 498 and well behind the United States at 505 (OECD, 2024). Youth unemployment remains stubbornly high, especially in the South, at the very moment businesses report they cannot find young people with entrepreneurial and managerial skills. The knowledge is being taught. The ability to use it is not being built.


A century-old model with modern evidence

The students' report points to Junior Achievement, a nonprofit founded in the United States in 1919, as the missing piece. Junior Achievement does not lecture students about business. It has them do business. Through programs like the JA Company Program, students create and operate real student-run enterprises during the school year: developing products, conducting market research, managing finances, and presenting to investors and judges. Other programs simulate personal financial decisions, from budgeting and saving to understanding credit and recognizing fraud.

The evidence of lasting impact is compelling. An independent Ipsos study found that 76 percent of JA alumni feel confident managing their personal finances, compared with 67 percent of non-alumni, and 68 percent regularly save part of their income, compared with 59 percent of non-participants (Ipsos, 2022). In Junior Achievement's 2026 Education for What's Next survey, 91 percent of education leaders said there is a disconnect between what students learn in school and the skills the workforce demands, and 94 percent said schools should do more about it (Junior Achievement USA, 2026).

The numbers tell the story

Junior Achievement operates worldwide through national member organizations, and comparing their reach is revealing. The figures below are approximate, drawn from organizational reporting, and definitions differ across countries: JA Italia, notably, reports "educational experiences" rather than unique students, which flatters the Italian figure (JA Italia, 2025). Even so, the pattern is unmistakable.

Annual reach of Junior Achievement member organizations

CountryJA member organizationStudents reached per year (approx.)School-age population (approx.)Indicative reach
United StatesJunior Achievement USA4,400,00054 million~8%
United KingdomYoung Enterprise250,00011 million~2%
IrelandJunior Achievement Ireland65,0001 million~6%
FranceEntreprendre Pour Apprendre100,00012 million~1%
GermanyIW JUNIOR90,00011 million~1%
ItalyJA Italia502,000 educational experiences*8 millionwell below potential

*One student may account for several "experiences"; the number of unique students reached is substantially lower. Sources: Junior Achievement USA (2025); Young Enterprise (2025); Junior Achievement Ireland (2025); Entreprendre Pour Apprendre (2025); IW JUNIOR (2025); JA Italia (2025).

Three conclusions leap out. First, no large European country comes close to the American penetration rate, so Italy is not alone. Second, Ireland proves the point within Europe: with reach approaching the American rate, it shows that deep penetration is not a peculiarity of the US system but a matter of national commitment. Third, and most importantly, the gap between Italy and the leaders shows what is achievable when a program of this kind becomes a normal, expected part of schooling rather than a fortunate exception. If Italy reached even half the American rate among its upper secondary students, hundreds of thousands of additional young people every year would graduate having actually practiced the skills employers say they cannot find. The room for growth is not marginal. It is the entire gap between a niche initiative and a national habit.

Junior Achievement is already in Italy, but unevenly

Junior Achievement has operated in Italy since 2002. Through initiatives such as Impresa in Azione, Idee in Azione, KidsVille, and Conta sul Futuro, JA Italia delivered those 502,000 educational experiences in the 2024-2025 school year with over 1,900 business volunteers and 1,200 teachers (JA Italia, 2025). Research by the Center for Young and Family Enterprise at the University of Bergamo found measurable improvements in entrepreneurial competence, digital skills, critical thinking, and career awareness among participants (CYFE, 2020).

The foundation exists. The problem is reach and consistency. Programs are concentrated in the North and Center, in Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, and Lazio, while the Southern regions that need these opportunities most, Campania, Calabria, Sicily, and Puglia, see the least of them. Participation depends on individual motivated teachers rather than national policy. Most Italian students will complete their entire schooling without ever encountering a JA program (Maddigan & Goetz, 2026).

The proposal: build on what works, in three phases

The heart of the report is a pragmatic plan (Maddigan & Goetz, 2026). Junior Achievement would be woven into subjects that business-focused technical and professional institutes already teach, economics, marketing, and entrepreneurship, and into the PCTO hours already required. Teachers gain no new burden; they gain a more engaging way to deliver existing objectives, and PCTO gains exactly the structure and quality control it has lacked.

Phase One, the first two years, launches pilots in professional institutes in regions such as Veneto, Tuscany, and Sicily, combining strong employer ecosystems with a deliberate attack on regional disparities. Success is measured concretely: participating schools and students, employer engagement, financial literacy gains. Phase Two, years three through five, extends to all business-focused technical and professional institutes, adding teacher training, regional coordinators, formalized Chamber of Commerce partnerships, and standardized assessment. Phase Three, years five through ten, pursues national integration: ministry recognition, dedicated funding, national entrepreneurship benchmarks, and presence in every region.

The report is honest about obstacles and practical about solutions. Teacher workload is managed by embedding JA in existing subjects. Volunteer recruitment leans on organizations with deep employer networks. Southern gaps are addressed through targeted investment and virtual mentorship. Funding can draw on national initiatives, EU programs, regional budgets, and private sponsorship. There is also an inclusion dividend: JA's hands-on, team-based approach fits naturally with Italy's individualized education plans and intercultural mediation, giving students with disabilities and migrant students concrete pathways to economic participation.

What heads of school can do now

School leaders do not need to wait for a national framework. Any dirigente scolastico of a business-focused institute can begin this school year:

  1. Contact JA Italia directly through jaitalia.org and request information on Impresa in Azione and programs suited to your institute's specializations.

  2. Map JA programs onto your existing curriculum. Identify where JA activities align with objectives in economics, marketing, administration, and PCTO hours, so participation replaces nothing and reinforces everything.

  3. Identify two or three motivated teachers as internal champions and enroll them in JA teacher orientation before annual planning closes.

  4. Approach your local Chamber of Commerce and employer associations to recruit mentors, asking for professionals willing to commit a small, defined number of hours per term.

  5. Start with one pilot class, ideally a third or fourth year group, and run a full student-company cycle from idea to final presentation.

  6. Measure from the start: participation, student and employer feedback, and simple before-and-after checks on financial literacy and transversal skills.

  7. Share the results with your regional school office, neighboring institutes, and local press. Visible evidence turns one pilot into a regional movement.

A call to action for Confindustria and the Camere di Commercio

Schools can adopt programs and teachers can champion them, but experiential business education without businesses is a contradiction in terms. Students need mentors who have actually met a payroll, priced a product, and lost and won customers.

To Confindustria, at national and territorial level: your member companies say they cannot find young people with entrepreneurial and managerial skills. Here is the mechanism to build them, proven abroad and already producing measurable results in Italy. Encourage your associates, especially SMEs, to adopt a class, contribute volunteer mentors, and open their doors for job shadowing. A few hours per month from a handful of professionals in each territory would transform the reach of these programs.

To the Camere di Commercio: you sit exactly where this initiative must be coordinated. You hold the employer networks, the local credibility, and the convening power to match schools with businesses at scale. Formalize partnerships with JA Italia and the technical and professional institutes in your provinces. Fund regional coordinators. Host the year-end student enterprise competitions that give young people a stage and your members a first look at the next generation of talent.

Two students looked at Italy from the outside and saw what those inside sometimes miss: an economy built on entrepreneurship, schools full of capable young people, and a missing bridge between the two. The table above shows how far that bridge could carry us. Ireland has already crossed it. What Italy needs now is partners willing to build it.

References

Center for Young and Family Enterprise (CYFE). (2020). Monitoring and evaluation of the Impresa in Azione program. Università degli Studi di Bergamo.

Entreprendre Pour Apprendre. (2025). Rapport d'activité 2024–2025. https://www.entreprendre-pour-apprendre.fr

European Commission. (2024). SME country fact sheet: Italy. Publications Office of the European Union. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu

Ipsos. (2022). Junior Achievement alumni impact study. Junior Achievement USA. https://jausa.ja.org

IW JUNIOR. (2025). Jahresbericht 2024–2025. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. https://www.iwjunior.de

JA Italia. (2025). Rapporto annuale 2024–2025. https://www.jaitalia.org

Junior Achievement Ireland. (2025). Annual report 2024–2025. https://www.jai.ie

Junior Achievement USA. (2025). Annual report 2024–2025. https://jausa.ja.org

Junior Achievement USA. (2026). Education for what's next: National survey of education leaders. https://jausa.ja.org

Maddigan, M., & Goetz, G. (2026). Integrating Junior Achievement successfully into the Italian school system [Unpublished research report]. USAC Verona, International Business Program.

OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume IV): How financially smart are students? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5a849c2a-en

Young Enterprise. (2025). Impact report 2024–2025. https://www.young-enterprise.org.uk

04/08/2026

Why Is Everyone in Europe Talking About "Competitiveness"?

 

First, what does "competitiveness" even mean?

Imagine a shop on a street with ten other shops selling similar things. If your shop is slow, expensive, and hard to find, people will just walk to the next one. If your shop is fast, well-priced, and easy to reach, people choose you. That's competitiveness: how good you are compared to others, when everyone is fighting for the same customers.

Now scale that idea up to an entire continent. "European competitiveness" means: how good is Europe, as a whole, at making things, inventing things, and selling things, compared to the United States, China, and everyone else? Can European companies grow, hire people, and pay good wages? Can Europe make its own semiconductors, batteries, and medicines, or does it have to depend on other countries for everything important?


This matters because competitiveness is not just an abstract economics word. It affects real things: how many jobs exist, how expensive your electricity bill is, whether the app or gadget you use was built in Europe or somewhere else, and whether Europe can defend itself and its allies without depending entirely on outside suppliers.

Europe’s €30 Billion Bet on “Giga AI Factories”

 What It Means for Universities and Research

The European Union’s plan to build seven “AI gigafactories” is not only an industrial policy initiative; it is also a major infrastructural investment in the future of European higher education and research. Backed by up to €10 billion in public funding and designed to attract at least another €20 billion in private capital, the initiative explicitly aims to give researchers, universities, and AI start‑ups sovereign access to frontier computing capacity (European Commission, 2026a; RTL Today, 2026). For university leaders, research managers, and doctoral supervisors, this signals a new era in which access to large‑scale AI infrastructure could become as strategic as participation in Horizon Europe consortia or membership in European University Alliances.


From “AI factories” to “gigafactories”: a new layer of research infrastructure

The gigafactories build on the existing EuroHPC “AI factories” network, which already links supercomputing centres with universities and research organisations to provide AI‑optimised compute, data services, and training (EuroHPC Joint Undertaking, 2025; Interface – Stiftung Neue Verantwortung, n.d.). The Commission and the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU) describe these AI factories as “one‑stop shops” for researchers, start‑ups, and SMEs, offering access to AI‑optimised high‑performance computing (HPC) resources, support for data preparation, model training, and deployment, and technical expertise and training in AI methods and tools (EuroHPC Joint Undertaking, 2025; RAISE, 2025).

27/07/2026

Be the leader

Leadership Under Crisis Aboard the Rose Noelle

On 4 June 1989, a homemade 12-metre trimaran capsized in the Southern Ocean and drifted upside down for 119 days before running ashore on Great Barrier Island, New Zealand. Its builder and skipper, John Glennie, had spent nineteen years constructing the boat and named her after a woman he had loved and lost years earlier (Evenson 25 July 2026, timestamp: 00:05:39–00:06:19). That backstory matters mainly as context: what makes the Rose Noelle a genuine case study in leadership is not the boat's name but what happened to its captain's authority once the boat went over — and what he did with the authority he had left.




Preparation as the First Act of Leadership

Glennie's conduct during the crisis cannot be separated from decisions he made years before it. As a young sailor he had already lost friends and colleagues to multihull capsizes, and from those losses he had built an explicit operating doctrine: a trimaran without a lead keel is more stable upside down than right-side up, and a crew's task in a capsize is simply to stay with the boat until it drifts to land (Evenson 25 July 2026, timestamp: 00:04:29–00:05:05). This is a useful reminder that leadership is often demonstrated before a crisis occurs, in the form of preparation, doctrine, and contingency thinking — not only in the improvisation that follows. When the wave hit and rolled the boat "like a toy," Glennie's first recorded thought was regret for his boat; his second was functional: "he knew there was work to do" (Evenson 25 July 2026, timestamp: 00:13:14–00:14:33). The doctrine did not prevent the disaster, but it gave him — and only him — a mental model for what came next.

17/07/2026

Give Peace A Chance: Legal Implications of the Israel-Palestine conflict by Professor Clive A. Stafford Smith


Here is the link to the original Gresham lecture and the version on Youtube. Italian version of summary below.

Summary

Here's a 10-point summary of Clive Stafford Smith's Gresham lecture, with keywords bolded:

  1. Framing: The piece opens with a Michael Franti lyric ("we can't bomb it into peace") to argue that Israel-Palestine discourse is dominated by blame ("antisemitic" vs. "Islamophobic") rather than genuine paths to peace, now spreading into Iran and beyond.
  2. US decline: Traces American soft power collapse from 9/11 through the Iraq War, Abu Ghraib, Guantánamo Bay, and rendition to torture, arguing US actions — not just extremist hatred — fueled anti-American sentiment (citing the small original Al Qaeda "charter member" list as proof the threat was self-inflated by the response).
  3. Core principle — hypocrisy: Introduces the recurring thesis "hypocrisy is the yeast that best ferments hatred," applied throughout to the US, UK, and Israel alike.
  4. Starmer's failure: Argues Keir Starmer's unpopularity stems from personal weakness and hypocrisy (banning MPs, proscribing Palestine Action as terrorism, eroding jury trials), not from genuine antisemitism among critics — and that this conflation actually fuels antisemitism.
  5. Personal/family history: A long autobiographical thread on the author's Jewish heritage (discovered late in life), his gay pacifist grandfather (WWI ambulance driver), and his university years in Jewish fraternities at UNC, used as a "microcosm" for competing visions of Israel.
  6. Israel's political arc: Contrasts the Labour/left-wing Israeli governments (Rabin, Peres, Meir — Nobel Peace Prize, 1994) before 1977 with the Likud-dominated, Netanyahu-era politics of today.
  7. History of antisemitism: A survey of 2,000+ years of Jewish persecution (Roman expulsions, medieval England, the Holocaust), used to validate Israeli/Jewish fear as historically grounded — including a personal anecdote about a pro-Hitler death-row executioner.
  8. The Palestinian counter-argument: Presents a Guantánamo client's case against Israel's legitimacy (Balfour Declaration, post-WWII founding, apartheid framing) — which the author partly engages with but ultimately rejects as unworkable ("turning back the clock").
  9. Critique of Netanyahu and the ICC: Blames Netanyahu for prolonging conflict in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran, contrasts him unfavorably with Ariel Sharon, and dismisses the ICC indictment as counterproductive (also flagging ICC racial bias in indictment statistics).
  10. Proposed way forward: Closes by comparing the conflict to Northern Ireland's sectarian violence (resolved partly via EU integration), and floats an unspecified "no-state solution" as a "Plan 3" beyond the standard one-state/two-state binary.

Transcript: Give Peace A Chance: Legal Implications of the Israel-Palestine Conflict

By Professor Clive A. Stafford Smith 30th April 2026

Michael Franti sings a mantra in the "Armageddon Version" of one of his best-known songs:

"We can bomb the world to pieces, but we can't bomb it into peace."


23/03/2026

The Structural Collapse of Welsh Higher Education: Why the People in Charge Are the Last to Feel It

 

A critical analysis of Dr. Albert Schram's landmark paper on governance failure, executive insulation, and financial unsustainability in Welsh universities


There is a particular cruelty to an institution that asks its lowest-paid workers to sacrifice their livelihoods while its highest-paid leaders remain untouched. It is a dynamic most people associate with failing corporations—not with universities, which are supposed to embody a higher set of values around public service, knowledge creation, and collective endeavour. Yet that is precisely the dynamic now playing out across the higher education sector in Wales, and a devastating new analysis by Dr. Albert Schram makes it impossible to look away (forthcoming).


01/03/2026

From Water to Air: The Po Valley's 3,000-Year Environmental Reckoning

Why one of Europe's wealthiest regions is choking on its own success — and what history tells us about the way out.


There is a stretch of land in northern Italy where civilisations have risen and fallen with the rhythms of a single, restless river. The Po Valley, cradled between the Alps to the north and the Apennines to the south, has been one of Europe's most consequential landscapes for over three millennia. It has nurtured Bronze Age glass artisans, Etruscan merchant princes, Venetian hydraulic engineers, and Fascist-era land reformers. Each generation faced the same fundamental challenge: how to master the water that gave the valley its extraordinary fertility, giving rise to highly productive agricuture, and innovative industries, while threatening to swallow its settlements whole.

Today, the Po Valley faces a new environmental crisis — not of water, but of air. The same bowl-shaped topography that once funnelled trade routes from the Baltic to the Mediterranean now traps atmospheric pollutants with devastating efficiency. Fine particulate matter regularly exceeds both European Union limits and World Health Organization guidelines, and the region endures some of the worst air quality on the continent. The question posed in this article is as simple as it is uncomfortable: if historical republics and authoritarian regimes alike could summon the political will to conquer water, why can't modern Europe conquer the air?