Beyond Personal Choice: Political Climate and the Exodus of US Scholars

A High-Profile Departure

A notable shift is occurring in the academic landscape as three prominent Yale University professors, all known for their scholarship on fascism and critical perspectives on the Trump administration, have announced their departure for the University of Toronto. 

• Jason Stanley, a distinguished philosopher and author of "How Fascism Works"; 
• Timothy Snyder, a renowned historian and author of "The Road to Unfreedom"; and 
• Marci Shore, a historian specializing in European intellectual history and author of "The Ukrainian Night," 

are all moving to Toronto's prestigious Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. This collective move by scholars deeply engaged with issues of democracy and authoritarianism raises significant questions about the current climate within American higher education. The exodus has begun.

Varied Reasons, Shared Undercurrents

While the move is collective, the stated reasons for leaving Yale vary among the scholars. Jason Stanley explicitly links his final decision to recent events at Columbia University, which he perceives as capitulating to political pressure from the Trump administration after facing significant funding cuts. Fearing Yale might follow a similar path, Stanley accepted Toronto's long-standing offer, viewing the move partly as an effort to "defend Canada" and engage in an "international fight against fascism."

Marci Shore describes her decision as intertwined personal and political factors, finalized after the November elections. She expresses profound concern about the direction of the United States, fearing a potential "civil war" and lacking confidence in the ability of American universities like Yale to protect faculty and students in the current environment. She also noted the lack of institutional defence when her husband, Timothy Snyder, faced public criticism from political figures. 

Snyder, conversely, emphasizes that his decision was made before the election primarily for personal family reasons, stating he has "no grievance with Yale." Despite Snyder's focus on personal motivations, the timing and context, particularly as highlighted by Shore, suggest the broader political climate remains a significant backdrop to these career decisions.

Implications for Academic Freedom and US Higher Ed

These departures, particularly those of Stanley and Shore, are seen by some observers as symptomatic of a larger unease within American academia. The article notes that the Trump administration has actively targeted universities, using financial leverage to influence institutional policies, as seen in the Columbia case. This creates an environment where even faculty at well-endowed institutions like Yale feel a sense of instability regarding academic freedom and institutional autonomy.

Experts like Keith Whittington of the Academic Freedom Alliance and Isaac Kamola from the AAUP confirm that concerns are rising, with some faculty, especially naturalized citizens, feeling potentially targeted. 

While these Yale professors represent high-profile cases with opportunities perhaps unavailable to all, their move highlights how international institutions are actively recruiting American academics. This raises the unsettling prospect of a 'brain drain' spurred not just by opportunity, but by anxieties over the political and intellectual climate within the United States, prompting serious reflection on the resilience and future of academic freedom in the country.

---

Reference:

Quinn, Ryan. "Outspoken Fascism Scholars Leave Yale for Canada." Inside Higher Ed, March 26, 2025. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/academic-freedom/2025/03/26/fascism-scholars-trump-critics-leave-yale-canada